PDA

View Full Version : How many watts do I need?


Harley
March 19th, 2007, 01:49 PM
Main forum or amp forum? Wasn't sure, but this main forum currently has over 10X more traffic. Mods can move it if they wish.

I read one of those posts today where the author used the, "It's really loud for and X watt amp". I decided to put a little info out there for the newer guys/gals that might be considering an amp purchase. Some is info grabbed from the web. Some is personal experience. Please feel free to argue against any or all of it. I only have about the same level of knowledge as anyone else here that's been playing for a while. A couple years ago I started building my own tube amps and began researching what influences their sounds at the same time.

I've always leaned towards the lighter side when it comes to live performance amps. Currently I'm using a 15W Vox. Previously it was a 22W Deluxe Reverb boutique build. I've even used a 6W vintage Gibson some. These are in venues like honky tonks, biker bars, etc. Just recall the club in the movie Roadhouse and you've got a good picture of an average-sized, rural bar.

I'll list a few things that relate to what I'm trying to get across-

1 Amp Wattages
2 Speaker Efficiency
3 Tube vs Solid-State volumes

Wattage
The way that watts translate into decibels is in powers of 10. You need to go 10x higher in wattage to get twice the volume. The difference in volume between 100W and 50W is actually only 12% less. Here's a list I got from the amptone site that's surprising to some. You may have seen it a few times on other discussion forums.
40 watts is 94% as loud as 50 watts.
30 watts is 86% as loud as 50 watts.
25 watts is 81% as loud as 50 watts.
22 watts is 78% as loud as 50 watts.
20 watts is 76% as loud as 50 watts.
18 watts is 74% as loud as 50 watts.
15 watts is 70% as loud as 50 watts.
12 watts is 65% as loud as 50 watts.
10 watts is 62% as loud as 50 watts.
9 watts is 60% as loud as 50 watts.
8 watts is 56% as loud as 50 watts.
7 watts is 55% as loud as 50 watts.
6 watts is 53% as loud as 50 watts.
5 watts is 50% as loud as 50 watts.
4 watts is 47% as loud as 50 watts.
3 watts is 43% as loud as 50 watts.
2 watts is 38% as loud as 50 watts.
1 watt is 31% as loud as 50 watts.
1/2 watt is 25% as loud as 50 watts.
Formula--> X% louder = 2^log10(P2/P1) * 100%
Speaker efficiency
I swear to you, my 15W Vox sounds louder than my best friend's 40W Hot Rod Deluxe. It took a while to figure out why, but the answer was really simple once we found the below science. The speaker in mine is the Celestion Alnico Blue which has a very high efficiency rating. His speaker is the factory Fender that came stock with the amp. If we were to A/B with each others speakers I'm sure the outcome would be different. He's just one of those guys that won't make any changes to ANYTHING.
Speaker efficiency is a key to volume. That curve is also not linear. If you take 2 otherwise identical speakers, one with a sensitivity rating of 103dB, and one with a rating of 100dB, that -3dB drop is the equivalent of sending half the power into the speakers... like moving from a 100W amp to a 50W amp, or about a 12% drop in volume.

Now, if you move from the 103dB speaker to a 97dB speaker that is otherwise identical, that -6dB drop is like moving from a 100W amp to a 25W amp. That being the case, a 25W amp played through 103dB speakers is exactly as loud as a 100W amp being played through 97dB speakers.
Similarly, when one plugs a small amp into a 4X12 cab, or similar, it'll sound BIG. Even a 2-watt amp can sound huge. I've done this with a Roland Micro Cube before, installing a speaker-out feature that cuts off the amp's internal speaker when a cab is pugged in. It is LOUD. These strange experiments just ease curiosities. The Cubes are really designed for use with full-range speakers and don't sound that good with guitar speakers.

Tube vs Solid State
Peak output of tube amplifiers is heard as being up to three times louder than similar rated solid state guitar amps. For example, a 30 watt tube amplifier can be perceived by the listener to be as loud as a 100 watt solid state amplifier, particularly when both are driven into maximum distortion.

As noted, this is actually the perceived loudness you're hearing. Watts are watts, and decibels are decibels. The below statement on Musicians Friend's buyers guide, and others like it, seem to confuse many into thinking the info is fact.
Tube watts are generally louder than solid state watts, particularly in the case of Class A amps, in which five watts can generate as much sound as some 40-watt solid-state amps produce.
Below is the most common explanation why. If I typed out my own explanation I'd only confuse myself in the end:) -
There have been many speculations about the reasons for these differences between measured and perceived performance. The oldest is probably the one that points out that tube amps tend to clip rather softly, whereas most transistor amps clip hard. So when you drive your tube amp into clipping, the occasional peaks will be compressed and rounded off—not chopped off, as would happen in a transistor amp, which is subjectively far more objectionable. Of more recent date are hypotheses that it is the different harmonic-distortion spectral contents of the two technologies that account for the perceived difference in loudness.

Arguably, most amps sound best when ran close to their peak output, sometimes described as a sweet spot. This is easier to do when the amp wattage is lower. But an argument exists that higher wattage amps allow more headroom. This mostly relates to clean players. "Headroom" is the range an amp has before it starts to break up. Through wattage, one can use compromise and obtain a desired volume/breakup level.

Also remember that in most live situations you'll have a PA system, either the house's or your own. When you throw a mic in front of an amp it can be as loud as you need it. This also gives you the ability to mix it in perfectly with the rest of the band.

"Can you turn it down a little?"-
I'll get this out of the way right here. Doesn't matter what the event is...within a few minutes of the first set there'll be a waitress that asks you to turn it down some. You can see this coming in advance. You'll see a middle-aged guy, sitting alone at the bar, flag down a waitress and point at the band. It happens EVERY TIME. You could be playing through headphones and it would still happen.:) As people start hitting the dance floor you start returning to previous or even higher volumes. I hate loud music myself, but you should be able to start out at normal jukebox levels. Wouldn't you think?

bobthecow
March 19th, 2007, 02:30 PM
Something you didn't write about that I would like to add is amp efficiency. My true hobby is car audio, and from experience with that stuff, I can tell you that amp efficiency is one of the most important factors. For instance, a cheap Sony amp has a signal to noise ratio of 78db, that means that as soon as you reach 78db you are going to start getting breakup, static, and amp shutdown. Whereas if you have a high quality Audiobahn amp, you are around a signal to noise ratio of 103db, meaning that you can be louder before any breakup or static occurs.

This is true for any amplification system, especially guitar amps. If you were to buy a low quality amp, such as Kustom, Pignose, or a low end Ibanez/Squier/Epiphone, you cant turn it up because the amp will produce alot of noise, and the speaker won't be able to produce music because of this. Whereas if you were to buy a Marshall, Fender, Behringer, or Gallien-Krueger(sp), you would be able to turn the amp to full blast and still get really good sound quality without static and amp shutoff.

Like you said, Harley, speakers are also very important. The best is probably Celestion. Most big name artists play through Celestion without any problems, and they are being played through some huge tube driven heads, 200w-1000w.

Harley
March 19th, 2007, 03:19 PM
If you were to buy a low quality amp, such as Kustom, Pignose, or a low end Ibanez/Squier/Epiphone, you cant turn it up because the amp will produce alot of noise, and the speaker won't be able to produce music because of this. Whereas if you were to buy a Marshall, Fender, Behringer, or Gallien-Krueger(sp), you would be able to turn the amp to full blast and still get really good sound quality without static and amp shutoff.
There seems to be a correlation here between quality of construction versus performance. Most of the lower end amps use total pc board mounting for circuit components, tube sockets, and pots. Higher priced amps will usually use similar layouts but also implement remote locations for sockets and pots. Then you have you older vintage amps and modern-day boutiques utilizing hand-wired, point-to-point layouts.

point-to-point $$$
http://img.villagephotos.com/p/2007-1/1241521/articlepic.jpg

hybrid $$
http://www.legendarytones.com/JTM45%20circuit%20board.jpg

PCB (printed circuit board) $
http://store.qkits.com/hires/k8011.jpg

disobedience
March 19th, 2007, 03:41 PM
I love this stuff!!

Thanks for the info...I've been looking at a 36 watt tube amp that absolutely kicks.
Celestion sound great but so do Eminence speakers. I've tried both and they both seem to have great sound capabilities.

bobthecow
March 19th, 2007, 04:06 PM
My only problem with eminence is that most of their speakers are paper cone it seems. Which, at low watts are okay, but if you wanna pump anything more than 150w into a single speaker you will blow that paper cone into nothing. But most people dont push 150w into a guitar speaker so it should be alright i guess.

Marshalldude
March 19th, 2007, 07:18 PM
Did you talked about lamp amps?

Pekker_Head
March 19th, 2007, 07:45 PM
My only problem with eminence is that most of their speakers are paper cone it seems. Which, at low watts are okay, but if you wanna pump anything more than 150w into a single speaker you will blow that paper cone into nothing. But most people dont push 150w into a guitar speaker so it should be alright i guess.
Dimebag Darrel (RIP) and his Krank Krankenstein used Eminence Texas Heat Drivers.
Eddie Van Halen uses Sheffield which is made for Peavey Amps
Me, the next famous guitarist uses both Sheffield and Celestions V 30s
And Kirk Hammett, Zakk Wylde Etc. use Celestions which are made in England I do believe so almost all Marshall cabinets and Orange Cabinets use them.

Though what Bobthecow forgot to mention was....
Lower wattage amps are perfect for Apartments and so fourth as You can 'crank' them and still not bother your sleeping neighbors and they sound better for that.
Though the original poster did mention that.

Along with speakers you also forgot to mention a point about what the speaker is enclosed in. Lets take a Marshall Cab versus a Mesa cab both loaded with Celestion V-30s Me I take the Mesa as its made of thicker wood and gives some more low end I do believe.
Now lets take a close back to an open back. Open backs do generally get louder as it can disperse the sound across the stage its downside it loses its low end and thats where close backs beat it. And some blues type players like Open Backs.

Also if you hate high electricity bills don't go for a huge wattage amp.

disobedience
March 19th, 2007, 07:47 PM
Lamp amps?
Showing my ignorance here...but I've only heard that term in Ham radio?!?

Pekker_Head
March 19th, 2007, 07:53 PM
Lamp amps?
Showing my ignorance here...but I've only heard that term in Ham radio?!?
I believe that is short for 'Laney Amps" which is an amp company in Britain and their most famed user is Tonni Iommy from Black Sabbath

bcrich
March 19th, 2007, 07:53 PM
LOL and by the way you get charged for kb versus wattage and amperage. SO I wouldn't worry about how many watts your amp is

Harley
March 19th, 2007, 08:47 PM
LOL and by the way you get charged for kb versus wattage and amperage. SO I wouldn't worry about how many watts your amp is
This will confuse most Americans, I'm sure. We get charged for "kw" hours, or 10 to the 3rd power of watt.

example-
The 60 watt bulb will dissipate 60 watts * 24 hours = 1440 watt-hours of power in one day. In one 30 day month, the bulb will dissipate 1.44 kW-hours/day * 30 days = 43.2 kW-hours. So the cost to operate the bulb is:
43.2 kW-hours * 0.08 dollars/kW-hour = $3.46
"kb", or kilobyte(10 to the power of 3 = 1000 to the 1st), isn't a common measurement here.

I should also address what was mentioned earlier about speakers while I'm here. I mainly addressed the components that effected volume. Speaker breakup, also known as "hair" or "edge", is more of an element of sound. Many choose models with an early break, while others like them to remain clean throughout their range, or in the middle of the 2 extremes.

There's a unique distortion associated with breakup, unlike that of overdriven or simulated electrical distortion.

marshallTSL
April 13th, 2007, 11:34 PM
someone was trying to sell the idea, that a watt, is a watt is a watt. my business is car audio, and i'll bet it's the same in amps too.

Cheap manufactures want to put the most watts possible to sell products.
they advertise peak power. Good manufactures advertise RMS, and great manufactures could care less how many watts they claim, casue they know, everyone who knows there stuff knows, they have plenty.

I don't understand all this loud business. i have 2 amps, a marshall TSL 100 and a Fender Hot rod deluxe, my ears hurt if i were to play them at 2.5/12, the marshall at 8 is enought to play a staduim. anyways, i guess i'm not cool enough to understand loud. MAYBEE! outside i could see needing the extra power.

(just a note)
for a while, car audio competitons were judges based on watt categories, so to allow their amps to slip into a lower category, manufactures rated them in bizzar ways, so a company called US AMPS, had "cheater" amps, they say 100watts, but when you drive them at 1 ohm, 2000 watts.

People do love big number though! peace out.! A TOWN!

Rock Monster
April 14th, 2007, 09:19 PM
Ok... i just need this straightened out. If i don't want to spend a lot of money and am not gigging yet, do i need to get a tube amp. For some reason i just don't see the difference why tube amps are so much better.... i want something that sounds good, but i don't want puiny thing or something that shreds my wallet.

jb007
April 14th, 2007, 09:38 PM
This will confuse most Americans, I'm sure. We get charged for "kw" hours, or 10 to the 3rd power of watt.


yea, we use kwh too...

Powerage
April 15th, 2007, 06:42 AM
Ok... i just need this straightened out. If i don't want to spend a lot of money and am not gigging yet, do i need to get a tube amp. For some reason i just don't see the difference why tube amps are so much better.... i want something that sounds good, but i don't want puiny thing or something that shreds my wallet.
Opinions for Solid State/Tubes could go on forever. However, my suggestion is, once you have narrowed your spending allotted, then go to a music store, and place comparable cost and amp size (speakers, 1-10", 1-12", 2-10" etc...) side by side and you will notice the difference of tone from one to the other. I have a solid state at the moment, but looking to purchase a tube amp very soon. :)

Powerage
"Sin City"

marshallTSL
April 15th, 2007, 08:30 PM
Simply put, solid state amps are trasition amps that TRY to replicate what tube amps sound like. most good players will make the transitoin at some point, probably after they hear a tube amp for the first time. Solid state offers more freatures, like build in effects, more types of distortion, tube amps offer tone and more resale value.

if you need flexibility, get a solid state like a cube 30/60, if you want tone, get a blues Jr or Deluxe.

Rock Monster
April 15th, 2007, 09:28 PM
ooookkkk... thank you Powerage and Marshalltsl, my question has been answered and i know what i'm looking for now... thank again guys.